Skip to content
VISOR & VENT

HUB 02 · Modular & Flip-Up Helmets

HJC i91 vs HJC RPHA 91

Same badge, two different helmets. One is the cheapest comfortable HJC flip-up; the other is our top modular pick on certification. Here's exactly what the price gap buys.

By Stephen V.Updated How we rate
#ad

We earn a commission when you buy through our Amazon links, at no extra cost to you. It never changes a ranking, and we tell you when the cheaper helmet is the better buy. How this works.

This is the cleanest upgrade decision HJC offers: the i91, the cheapest comfortable modular in the range, against the RPHA 91, our top modular pick overall. Same brand, same flip-up format, same sun-visor-and-comms convenience — but the price roughly doubles, and the question is whether what it buys is worth it to you.

Certification: the RPHA 91 wins, clearly

This is the heart of it. The US i91 on Amazon is marketed DOT-approved, and HJC's European i91 has shipped in both ECE 22.05 and 22.06 depending on the run — so we don't assert current 22.06 on the US unit. The RPHA 91 carries genuine ECE 22.06 with P/J homologation and an independent 4/5 SHARPscore. If you rank a helmet by the mark on the shell and the data behind it, the RPHA 91 is the materially stronger helmet, and it isn't close.

Weight, quiet and finish

The RPHA 91's composite (PIM EVO) shell is lighter at ~1,740 g than the i91's polycarbonate ~1,720 g feel-and-finish class, quieter at highway speed, and plusher inside. The i91 is perfectly comfortable — its whole reason to exist is comfort per dollar — but the RPHA 91 is a noticeable step up in refinement, the kind you feel on a 300-mile day. Both take HJC's Smart HJC comms and both have a drop-down sun visor and a Pinlock-ready shield, so the convenience features are a wash; the difference is materials, weight and the certification.

Price and value

The i91 is roughly half the RPHA 91's price, and that is its entire argument. If your budget is the constraint, DOT is enough for you, and you want a real-brand flip-up with a sun visor and Pinlock capability, the i91 delivers exactly that and nothing you don't need. If you can stretch, the RPHA 91 gives you current certification, independent safety data and a better helmet to live with.

Everyday comfort and who each suits

In daily use the two feel more alike than the price gap suggests, which is a credit to the i91: both are comfortable, both have the sun visor and Pinlock-ready shield, both take HJC comms, and both flip up easily in gloves. The RPHA 91 pulls ahead where you'd expect a helmet at twice the price to — the composite shell is a little lighter and noticeably quieter, the interior feels a grade more premium, and the finish is tidier. On a short commute you might not notice; on a 300-mile day you will. Think of the i91 as the helmet that does 85% of what the RPHA 91 does for half the money, with the missing 15% being certification, quiet and refinement.

So the decision is really about your riding and your budget. A new or occasional rider on a tight budget who commutes and takes the odd short trip is well served by the i91 and won't feel short-changed. A rider who does long days, cares about the current ECE 22.06 standard, or simply wants the better helmet and can afford it should buy the RPHA 91 and not look back. The nice thing about them sharing a brand is that the upgrade path is seamless if you start with the i91 and later want more.

The verdict

Buy the i91if price leads and DOT satisfies you — it's the honest cheap option and a fine commuter. Buy the RPHA 91if you want the certification story done right: genuine ECE 22.06 P/J, a 4/5 SHARP score, and a lighter, quieter, plusher helmet. For most riders who can afford the step, the RPHA 91 is the one we'd point at — it's our top modular pick for a reason. Read the full RPHA 91 review or the i91 review for the detail on each.

The short answer

Quick picks, by the mark on the shell

#HelmetCertificationScorePrice
01
HJC HJC RPHA 91
HJC RPHA 91

The value-flagship modular that quietly out-certifies the big names: ECE 22.06 P/J, a 4/5 SHARP score, at half a Neotec's price.

DOT certifiedECE 22.06 certifiedSHARP ★★★★
8.6
$559.99Amazon
02
HJC HJC i91
HJC i91

The honest budget modular: a comfortable, sun-visor-equipped flip-up that clears DOT at a genuinely low price — as long as you don't need it to prove ECE 22.06.

DOT certifiedECE 22.06 unverified
7.6
$253.95Amazon

#ad · Live prices from the Amazon Product API, as of Aug 4, 2026. Certifications reflect the US-market build and are cited in Sources. Where a live price has rotted, we show none.

In detail

The picks, in full

01
HJC HJC RPHA 91

Best-certified modular for the money

HJC RPHA 91

DOT certifiedECE 22.06 certifiedSHARP ★★★★
PIM EVO composite~1,740 g (M)ECE 22.06 P/JSHARP 4/5
8.6/10

The value-flagship modular that quietly out-certifies the big names: ECE 22.06 P/J, a 4/5 SHARP score, at half a Neotec's price.

Certification
9.5
Value
9.5
Quiet
8
Weight
8
Finish
8

Pros

  • ECE 22.06 with P/J dual-homologation — legally approved to ride with the chin bar up
  • Independently SHARP-tested at 4/5, a real safety data point
  • Composite shell keeps weight and price down together

Cons

  • Not as whisper-quiet as a Neotec 3
  • Interior plushness is a notch below the premium Japanese brands

Don't buy this if…

outright touring silence matters more to you than certification and price — the Neotec 3 is quieter.

$559.99View on Amazon

Price as of Aug 4, 2026. Prices change — Amazon's at checkout is the one that counts.

#ad · we may earn a commission from this link to HJC RPHA 91

02
HJC HJC i91

Cheapest comfortable commuter modular

HJC i91

DOT certifiedECE 22.06 unverified
Polycarbonate composite~1,720 g (M)DOT (US listing)Sun visor + Pinlock-ready
7.6/10

The honest budget modular: a comfortable, sun-visor-equipped flip-up that clears DOT at a genuinely low price — as long as you don't need it to prove ECE 22.06.

Certification
6.5
Value
9
Features
8
Comms
8
Weight
6.5

Pros

  • One of the cheapest flip-ups from a major brand that still ships DOT-approved with a Pinlock-ready shield
  • Drop-down HJ-V12 internal sun visor most budget modulars leave off
  • Ready for HJC's Smart HJC / Sena comms with no external bolt-on

Cons

  • The US Amazon listing is marketed DOT only — no confirmed ECE 22.06, unlike the pricier RPHA 91
  • Polycarbonate shell is heavy (~1,720 g) and not as refined as a composite flagship

Don't buy this if…

the current ECE 22.06 rotational standard with P/J approval is your requirement — step up to the HJC RPHA 91, which carries genuine 22.06 P/J and a 4/5 SHARP score.

$253.95View on Amazon

Price as of Aug 4, 2026. Prices change — Amazon's at checkout is the one that counts.

#ad · we may earn a commission from this link to HJC i91

How we picked

We do not crash-test helmets

We compiled published specifications, cited each helmet's certification (DOT, ECE 22.06, Snell, SHARP) from the standards body or manufacturer homologation, and aggregated owner reports, then scored against a published method. The scores are judgments from documented research — not measurements we took. We do not run a crash lab. Certifications reflect the US-market build; where it differs from the European version, we say so and cite it.

Questions

Frequently asked

Is the HJC RPHA 91 worth double the i91?
If certification and refinement matter to you, yes. The RPHA 91 carries genuine ECE 22.06 P/J and a 4/5 SHARP score, and it's lighter, quieter and plusher than the DOT-marketed i91. If budget leads and DOT is enough, the i91 is the honest cheaper choice with the same sun visor and comms convenience.
Do the i91 and RPHA 91 use the same comms?
Both are ready for HJC's Smart HJC / Sena comms with no external bolt-on, and both have a drop-down sun visor and a Pinlock-ready shield. The convenience features are effectively the same; the difference is shell material, weight, quiet and certification.
Which HJC modular is safer?
On published data, the RPHA 91 — it carries genuine ECE 22.06 with P/J and an independent 4/5 SHARP score, while the US i91 is marketed DOT-approved with an unverified ECE status. Both are from a reputable maker; the RPHA 91 simply has the stronger, current certification and independent testing.

Keep reading

Receipts

Sources

We do not run a crash lab, and we do not pretend to. Certifications are cited to the standards body or the manufacturer's stated homologation; where a US model's certification differs from its European namesake, we say so. Where we could not verify something, we say so on the page rather than quietly leaving it out. Read our full method.