Skip to content
VISOR & VENT

HUB 02 · Modular & Flip-Up Helmets

LS2 Advant X vs Scorpion EXO-GT930

One is the current ECE revision in forged carbon at about 1,550 g. The other is the older revision in polycarbonate at about 1,890 g - and converts into a genuine open-face. That is the whole decision.

By Stephen V.Updated How we rate
#ad

We earn a commission when you buy through our Amazon links, at no extra cost to you. It never changes a ranking, and we tell you when the cheaper helmet is the better buy. How this works.

Buy the LS2 Advant X. It carries genuine DOT + ECE 22.06 with P/J dual homologation - the current revision, with the oblique rotational-impact test, approved to ride open or closed - in a forged-carbon shell at about 1,550 g. The Scorpion EXO-GT930 Transformer is verified at ECE 22.05, not 22.06, and weighs about 1,890 g. Who the Scorpion is for: the hot-weather commuter who genuinely wants a helmet that converts all the way to a true open-face, and who is making the certification and weight trade knowingly. That is a real use case; it is just not the default one.

Both certifications below are verified rather than assumed - the LS2 from its homologation and the Scorpion from a detailed review of the helmet, both cited at the foot of the page. We do not crash-test helmets and we have no lab. One note on the Scorpion in particular: a few marketplace listings claim ECE 22.06 for the GT930 and we treat that as unverified. The documented approval is 22.05 P/J.

Head to head on the specs that decide it

 LS2 Advant XScorpion EXO-GT930 Transformer
Certification (US)DOT + ECE 22.06 P/JDOT + ECE 22.05 P/J
ShellForged carbon fiberPolycarbonate
Published weight~1,550 g~1,890 g (XL)
Shell sizesTwo across the rangeNot published as a scaling claim
Converts to open-faceNo - flips up 180 degreesYes - chin bar and shield come off entirely
Sun visorYes, drop-downYes, drop-down
RetentionMicrometric ratchetMicrometric ratchet
Comms provisionChannel for LS2's Cardo-based 4XSpeaker pockets
SHARP resultNot testedNot tested

The certification gap is the headline, and it is a real gap

ECE 22.05 and 22.06 are not two labels for the same test. 22.06 added an oblique impact test that loads the helmet at an angle to measure rotational acceleration - the mechanism behind a large share of serious brain injury - along with more impact points, a wider range of test speeds and accessory testing. A 22.05 helmet was never put through it. That is why the Advant X wins this comparison on the first line and why we rank certification above everything else; the full detail is in ECE 22.06 explained.

Both helmets do share the P/J code, which is worth knowing because most flip-ups do not: P/J means the helmet is approved in both the closed and open positions, so riding with the chin bar up is within its homologation rather than outside it. Most modulars are approved closed only - see are modular helmets safe?

340 grams is not a rounding error

The weight difference here is roughly 340 g, which is about three quarters of a pound sitting on top of your neck at the end of a lever. On a 20-minute commute you will not notice. On a four-hour day, or in stop-start traffic where you are turning your head constantly, it is the difference between arriving fresh and arriving with a sore neck - and the Advant X is lighter than many one-piece full-face helmets, let alone flip-ups. We explain why grams matter more than the number suggests in helmet weight explained.

LS2 Advant X - the one to buy

The Advant X is the certification-and-weight bargain of the modular class: genuine ECE 22.06 with P/J in a full forged-carbon shell at about 1,550 g, with a drop-down sun visor and a channel for LS2's Cardo-based 4X comms. Who it is for: the rider who wants a flip-up, wants the current standard and refuses to carry 1,900 g to get a sun visor.

The honest cons: the 180-degree flip mechanism and modular seams make it louder at highway speed than a one-piece carbon full-face - carbon does not fix a seam across your face. It uses a micrometric ratchet strap rather than a Double-D ring, which some riders dislike on principle, and only two shell sizes cover the whole range, so the fit at the extremes is more padding than shell. There is no SHARP result. Full detail in the LS2 Advant X review, and against the premium benchmark in LS2 Advant X vs Shoei Neotec 3.

Scorpion EXO-GT930 Transformer - buy it for the conversion or not at all

The GT930 earns its name. Unlike a normal flip-up, which parks the chin bar above your forehead, the Transformer's chin bar and shield come off completely, leaving a genuine three-quarter open-face - and it holds P/J homologation, so riding it open is approved. Add a drop-down sun visor and a friendly price and you have a helmet that covers three configurations nothing else in this bracket matches. Who it is for: the hot-climate commuter who wants a full-face in winter and an open-face in August from one purchase.

The honest cons: it is ECE 22.05, not 22.06, which is the whole reason it loses this comparison, and the heavy polycarbonate shell at about 1,890 g is the heaviest lid in our modular coverage. It is not the quietest helmet either. If the conversion feature is not genuinely something you will use, there is no argument for it over the Advant X. See the EXO-GT930 review, the budget head-to-head in HJC i91 vs Scorpion EXO-GT930, and the ADV sibling in EXO-AT960 vs EXO-GT930 - note that the AT960 does carry 22.06, so Scorpion publishes the current revision when the helmet holds it.

HJC i91 - the cheaper third option, with its own caveat

If both of the above are more than you want to spend, the i91 is the honest budget answer: one of the cheapest flip-ups from a major brand that still ships DOT-approved with a Pinlock-ready HJ-33 shield and a drop-down HJ-V12 sun visor, and it is ready for Smart HJC / Sena comms with no external bolt-on. Who it is for: the commuter who wants a comfortable flip-up with a sun visor for the least money.

The honest cons: the US Amazon listing is marketed DOT only- HJC's European i91 exists in both 22.05 and 22.06 variants depending on production date, so we do not assert 22.06 on the US unit; confirm the label on the helmet you buy. The polycarbonate shell is heavy at about 1,720 g and not as refined as a composite. Detail in the HJC i91 review.

Which one, in one line each

LS2 Advant X if you want the current ECE revision and the lightest flip-up for the money - which is most riders reading this. Scorpion EXO-GT930 only if the full open-face conversion is a feature you will genuinely use, and you accept 22.05 and 1,890 g as the price of it. HJC i91 if budget is the binding constraint and you can live without a named ECE revision. Whichever you pick, measure your head first - how to measure your helmet size - because the Advant X covers the whole range on two shells, and that makes fit checking more important, not less. The ranked class list is at best budget modular helmets and all modular helmets.

The short answer

Quick picks, by the mark on the shell

#HelmetCertificationScorePrice
01
LS2 LS2 Advant X
LS2 Advant X

The featherweight certification bargain: a genuine ECE 22.06 P/J flip-up in a ~1,550 g forged-carbon shell, for a fraction of a premium modular's price.

DOT certifiedECE 22.06 certified
8.3
$499.98Amazon
02
Scorpion Scorpion EXO-GT930 Transformer
Scorpion EXO-GT930 Transformer

A genuinely clever three-in-one that converts full-face to open-face — but read the certification: it's ECE 22.05, not 22.06.

DOT certifiedECE 22.05 certified
7.7
$279.95Amazon
03
HJC HJC i91
HJC i91

The honest budget modular: a comfortable, sun-visor-equipped flip-up that clears DOT at a genuinely low price — as long as you don't need it to prove ECE 22.06.

DOT certifiedECE 22.06 unverified
7.6
$265.99Amazon

#ad · Live prices from the Amazon Product API, as of October 21, 2026. Certifications reflect the US-market build and are cited in Sources. Where a live price has rotted, we show none.

In detail

The picks, in full

01
LS2 LS2 Advant X

Lightest ECE 22.06 P/J modular for the money

LS2 Advant X

DOT certifiedECE 22.06 certified
Forged carbon fiber~1,550 gDOT + ECE 22.06 P/JSun visor + Cardo-ready
8.3/10

The featherweight certification bargain: a genuine ECE 22.06 P/J flip-up in a ~1,550 g forged-carbon shell, for a fraction of a premium modular's price.

Certification
9
Weight
9
Value
8.5
Features
8
Quiet
7

Pros

  • Genuine ECE 22.06 with P/J homologation in a full forged-carbon shell
  • About 1,550 g makes it one of the lightest modulars you can buy — real neck-fatigue relief on long days
  • Drop-down sun visor and a channel for LS2's Cardo-based 4X comms

Cons

  • The 180-degree flip mechanism and modular seams make it louder at highway speed than a one-piece carbon full-face
  • Uses a micrometric ratchet strap rather than a Double-D ring, and only two shell sizes cover the whole range

Don't buy this if…

…outright touring silence is your first priority — a sealed premium modular like the Shoei Neotec 3 is quieter, if heavier and far pricier.

$499.98View on Amazon

Price as of October 21, 2026. Prices change — Amazon's at checkout is the one that counts.

#ad · we may earn a commission from this link to LS2 Advant X

02
Scorpion Scorpion EXO-GT930 Transformer

Budget convertible commuting

Scorpion EXO-GT930 Transformer

DOT certifiedECE 22.05 certified
Polycarbonate~1,890 g (XL)DOT + ECE 22.05 P/JFull-face ↔ open-face
7.7/10

A genuinely clever three-in-one that converts full-face to open-face — but read the certification: it's ECE 22.05, not 22.06.

Certification
7.5
Versatility
9
Value
8.5
Weight
6.5
Quiet
7

Pros

  • Converts fully to an open-face — rare and genuinely useful for hot commutes
  • P/J homologation, so riding open is approved
  • Drop-down sun visor and a friendly price

Cons

  • ECE 22.05, not the newer 22.06 with its rotational-impact test
  • Heavy polycarbonate shell

Don't buy this if…

…you want the current 22.06 rotational standard — step up to the ECE 22.06 EXO-AT960 or the HJC RPHA 91.

$279.95View on Amazon

Price as of October 21, 2026. Prices change — Amazon's at checkout is the one that counts.

#ad · we may earn a commission from this link to Scorpion EXO-GT930 Transformer

03
HJC HJC i91

Cheapest comfortable commuter modular

HJC i91

DOT certifiedECE 22.06 unverified
Polycarbonate composite~1,720 g (M)DOT (US listing)Sun visor + Pinlock-ready
7.6/10

The honest budget modular: a comfortable, sun-visor-equipped flip-up that clears DOT at a genuinely low price — as long as you don't need it to prove ECE 22.06.

Certification
6.5
Value
9
Features
8
Comms
8
Weight
6.5

Pros

  • One of the cheapest flip-ups from a major brand that still ships DOT-approved with a Pinlock-ready shield
  • Drop-down HJ-V12 internal sun visor most budget modulars leave off
  • Ready for HJC's Smart HJC / Sena comms with no external bolt-on

Cons

  • The US Amazon listing is marketed DOT only — no confirmed ECE 22.06, unlike the pricier RPHA 91
  • Polycarbonate shell is heavy (~1,720 g) and not as refined as a composite flagship

Don't buy this if…

…the current ECE 22.06 rotational standard with P/J approval is your requirement — step up to the HJC RPHA 91, which carries genuine 22.06 P/J and a 4/5 SHARP score.

$265.99View on Amazon

Price as of October 21, 2026. Prices change — Amazon's at checkout is the one that counts.

#ad · we may earn a commission from this link to HJC i91

How we picked

We do not crash-test helmets

We compiled published specifications, cited each helmet's certification (DOT, ECE 22.06, Snell, SHARP) from the standards body or manufacturer homologation, and aggregated owner reports, then scored against a published method. The scores are judgments from documented research — not measurements we took. We do not run a crash lab. Certifications reflect the US-market build; where it differs from the European version, we say so and cite it.

Questions

Frequently asked

Is the LS2 Advant X better than the Scorpion EXO-GT930?
For most riders, yes, and on two measurable grounds. The Advant X holds genuine DOT + ECE 22.06 with P/J dual homologation - the current revision, including the oblique rotational-impact test - in a forged-carbon shell at about 1,550 g. The GT930 is verified at ECE 22.05 and weighs about 1,890 g. The GT930's counter-argument is its full conversion to a true open-face, which the Advant X cannot do.
Is the Scorpion EXO-GT930 ECE 22.06?
No. It is verified as DOT + ECE 22.05 with P/J homologation. Some marketplace listings claim 22.06 for it and we treat that as unverified. Worth noting that Scorpion does publish 22.06 where a helmet holds it - the EXO-AT960 adventure modular is a genuine 22.06 helmet - so the 22.05 on the GT930 is a real difference between models rather than a brand-wide gap.
What does P/J homologation mean, and do both helmets have it?
Both do. P/J means the helmet is type-approved in two configurations - P for the protective closed position and J for the open jaw position - so riding it with the chin bar up is inside its approval. Most flip-ups are approved closed only, which makes riding them open an off-label use of the helmet, so it is a code worth looking for on any modular.
Does 340 g of extra helmet weight really matter?
On a short commute, no. Over a long day it does: the mass sits at the top of your neck at the end of a lever, so it shows up as fatigue when you turn your head and as soreness at the end. About 340 g is roughly three quarters of a pound, which puts the Advant X lighter than many one-piece full-face helmets and the GT930 among the heaviest flip-ups we cover.
Which is quieter?
Neither is quiet, and we would not pick between them on noise alone. The Advant X's 180-degree flip mechanism and modular seams make it louder at highway speed than a one-piece carbon full-face, and the GT930 is not the quietest helmet in its class either. If wind noise is your main complaint, earplugs will do more than a helmet swap - the physics is in our guide to making a helmet quieter.

Keep reading

Receipts

Sources

We do not run a crash lab, and we do not pretend to. Certifications are cited to the standards body or the manufacturer's stated homologation; where a US model's certification differs from its European namesake, we say so. Where we could not verify something, we say so on the page rather than quietly leaving it out. Read our full method.